What happened

On 15 December 2017, Mr Osman’s small car collided with a truck turning right across his direction of travel. Severe brain injury left him without legal capacity, and his grandfather conducted the proceedings as tutor. Witness and traffic-signal evidence led the court to find that he entered the intersection just after the light turned red.

The issues

The principal questions were whether the truck driver reasonably assumed the approaching car would stop, and how to compare that failure with the plaintiff’s red-light entry. Quantum included permanent loss of earning capacity and whether the evidence justified the then maximum non-economic loss award.

The court's decision

The truck driver could see the approaching car and should have continued checking that the turn was safe. Comparing the plaintiff’s red-light entry with the truck driver’s conduct and the truck’s greater capacity to cause serious harm, the court applied a 50% reduction. It assessed AUD 1,977,406 before reduction and AUD 988,703 afterwards, directing preparation of orders addressing funds management and costs.

Understanding the figures

Non-economic loss of AUD 595,000 and past and future earnings and superannuation produced assessed damages of AUD 1,977,406, reduced by 50% to AUD 988,703. The long-service-leave claim was abandoned. These figures remained subject to funds management and final orders and are not a verified net payment.

What this case shows

An expectation that another driver would obey the road rules did not justify disregarding a visible, immediate risk. Apportionment considered both blameworthiness and the causal contribution of the vehicles and conduct to the injuries.

Why another case may differ

This is a stage-specific determination for a December 2017 accident under the Motor Accident Injuries Act 2017, not a statement of the final amount ultimately payable. The AUD 595,000 non-economic loss maximum was historical. The assessment did not purport to include all treatment and care, and the subsequent funds-management allowance and final costs orders are not established by this source.

Applying it to your claim

Different facts, evidence or procedures, an appeal, or a change in the law may affect how this decision applies. This is general information, not a report of a case handled by Park & Co Lawyers.

Considering a second opinion? →