What happened
On 18 July 2020 two nurses were returning the patient from radiology to intensive care when the bed struck a wall. He subsequently reported left-leg pain and altered sensation, and further surgery identified bone graft material beneath a nerve.
The issues
The hospital challenged findings about the collision, foreseeability and the causal link to nerve damage. The Court also examined whether economic loss, care, medical expenses and equipment had been established as compensable consequences.
The court's decision
Liability remained intact, including the finding that stopping the bed before releasing control was a simple available precaution. The appeal succeeded only in part on damages; the later [2024] NSWCA 94 preserved the trial costs orders and required the hospital to pay 75% of the patient's appeal costs.
Understanding the figures
The AUD 583,711 trial award was reduced to 350,187.60. The appellate subtotal of 500,268 already included a 50,000 deduction for an anticipated workers compensation lump sum, before the retained 30% Malec reduction. The later decision confirmed that the substituted order took effect from 11 August 2023; costs are separate from the damages principal.
What this case shows
An unusual injury mechanism did not make the risk of harm from a bed collision unforeseeable. For quantum, a buffer for future expenses still required evidence and reasoning addressing existing workers compensation funding.
Why another case may differ
The patient had substantial pre-existing spinal problems and workers compensation entitlements, requiring the additional injury to be separated from that background. Some reductions followed concessions, and the retained 30% Malec adjustment was not a finding of contributory negligence.
Applying it to your claim
Different facts, evidence or procedures, an appeal, or a change in the law may affect how this decision applies. This is general information, not a report of a case handled by Park & Co Lawyers.
Considering a second opinion? →