What happened
In November 2017, a wooden pool step on the Pacific Aria broke beneath the plaintiff, causing a drop of about 30 cm. CCTV showed him landing on his feet without striking his neck or shoulder. A separate fall in a toilet cubicle about a month later complicated the assessment of his symptoms and pre-existing degeneration.
The issues
The central issue was whether the collapse caused lasting neck, shoulder and psychological injury rather than a temporary muscular strain. Medical opinions based on the plaintiff's account had to be tested against the CCTV, contemporaneous records, later accident and other stressors.
The court's decision
The Court entered judgment for Carnival with costs because causation of the continuing injuries was not proved. On 16 July 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal and allowed Carnival's costs cross-appeal, ordering trial costs on an indemnity basis from 20 April 2022.
What this case shows
Pain reported after an accident does not by itself establish that all later symptoms came from that event. Evidence of the injury mechanism and an accurate history can be decisive when evaluating medical opinions.
Why another case may differ
This was a shipboard negligence claim, not a statutory motor accident claim. The trial applied the Civil Liability Act 2002; the appeal noted that the choice-of-law issues had not been fully addressed, so the case does not settle the law governing every cruise injury. The trial's damages discussion was provisional and produced no damages award.
Applying it to your claim
Different facts, evidence or procedures, an appeal, or a change in the law may affect how this decision applies. This is general information, not a report of a case handled by Park & Co Lawyers.
Considering a second opinion? →