What happened
The claim arose from a single-vehicle collision on 8 September 2011, with the plaintiff travelling as a passenger in his own car. The Court found that he supplied and consumed drugs with the driver and urged her to continue after she stopped and indicated that she was unfit to drive.
The issues
The central question was whether the parties' joint unlawful conduct and the plaintiff's involvement displaced the ordinary duty between driver and passenger. The Court also considered scope of liability and, alternatively, contributory negligence.
The court's decision
The Court upheld the illegality defences and entered judgment for the defendant, with costs reserved. Its alternative finding of 70% contributory negligence was conditional on liability being established; it did not produce an award of damages.
What this case shows
The decision turns on the passenger's active contribution to the unlawful and dangerous journey. It illustrates why supplying the vehicle and drugs and pressing an unfit driver to continue can raise questions beyond ordinary passenger contributory negligence.
Why another case may differ
This was a liability-only decision concerning a 2011 accident under the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 framework. Quantum was separately reserved and a psychiatric impairment assessment remained pending; the reasoning should not be treated as a general rule governing every passenger claim today.
Applying it to your claim
Different facts, evidence or procedures, an appeal, or a change in the law may affect how this decision applies. This is general information, not a report of a case handled by Park & Co Lawyers.
Considering a second opinion? →